transparency.tv - at the core of future capitalism

 

http://yunusolympics.com eg 1 clean energy; 2 end nurseless communities; 3 create blion jobs with new tech and youth; 4 turn education bottom up;

 

peter Your contribution to USAID virtual dialogue on this transparency-destructing area of globalisation distortion is a really big one; I was quite upset I couldnt get into yunus berlin day hosted with peter eigen ex head of transparency international but they called themselves some private berlin club

 

none of us have the experience of battling the world bank and other elites as regards africa that you have; and when for example you say in prior mails that the major systemic concern of the world bank these days is to fund the enormous pensions now owing to the bubble of staff who are retiring, it seems to me clear that government to government institutions are the greatest macroeconomic wastemakers blocking end poverty's race

 

YOUR FESTIVALPANEL

do we anywehere have 3 or 4 people who as a group share your argument and life experience context?; I am in so many system changes think-panels that I dont want to be in this one; it annoys me a hell of a lot that there is such system waste but there is no way I can argue it politely

 

I am making an assumption that londoners will be asked to form abouth 12 olympics sb festival panels and to make sure that all their ideas are animated, co-published, web-networked coming together in summer of 2012; this is both a long way off and not at all a long way off if all panel's ideas are to be worked out in a way that make sense to them and other panel members

 

we do not know if yunus will give us overall coordinating authority of such panels; if we ever do get the green light then this panel question will urgently need to be formed if a panel of this elite transparency is to be one of the things londoners sb festival animates

 

if  understand correctly yunus collaboration gameboard most matching peter is yunus call to start an asian union on a micro up model that is every way the opposite of the euro union or world bank or united nation models -see left column of http://collaboration11.blogspot.com/ for yunus india speech that majored on asian union

 

I dont know if anyone circulated or whom I could have circulated ultmately feels in the same area as I interpret peter to be; if so please communicate with him particularly

 

Peter we had that day when we both met senior guy from oxfam usa and guy who networks diversity interests through world trade sites- are these people to try and get on this panel

 

chris

 

In a sensible world Yunus Olympics festival would build onWhatever global grameen summit 2010 connectsWhatever microcreditsummit 2010 and 2011 connectsOther micro up or collaboration partner events 

As well as feed in to the milan 2015 whose mayor has already been booked by yunus as likely to be number millennium goals SB festival; quite frankly UK outside scotland hasn’t actioned much in terms of yunus global partners except through ashden energy dimension; if it wasn’t for the Olympics being the main world stage yunus wants to co-brand in the next 5 years he’d probably write most of uk off as not a SB country however hard people like mostofa and Sofia try t make it one; but that is why uk yunus mustn’t lose Olympics sb festivals to outside organizers whilst inviting everyone in micro change world to map how london can open source their micro up solutions or biggest crisis challenges and do this in such a way that the bbc sees its future is in helping to animate the beyond gov solutions to sustainability not be constrained within that as if one dimensional political parties can ever resolve sustainability most long term and cross-border challenges

--- On Tue, 29/12/09, communities@seepnetwork.org <communities@seepnetwork.org> wrote:


From: communities@seepnetwork.org <communities@seepnetwork.org>
Subject: Comment for Discussion: USAID Launches Value Chain Development Wiki
To: chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Tuesday, 29 December, 2009, 15:07

(((Please Reply ABOVE this Line to Post a Comment)))
----------------
Greetings Chris Macrae,
Comment by PeterBurgess: Distortion - economic damage and a better framework for analysis
    Dear Mozharul Islam

    You raise the issue of “distortion” in the community economy that results from the activities of development agents …. whether this is government intervention, humanitarian relief, World Bank “projects”, foreign direct investment, etc.
    This matter is rarely incorporated either in the “planning” of projects for relief and development nor in the typical “monitoring and evaluation” process. In my own work in this area, I have always tried to think through this because it is a big issue and explains a lot about the rather widespread failure of development … as described in many books, and most recently by Dambisa Moyo in her book “Dead Aid” 
    The Community Analytics (CA) framework has a value chain analysis dimension over time … essentially a combination of value accounting with some Keynesian overtones, the good impact of a project when it is starting and being set up … then offset when the project is winding down some time later. But it is worse, the good that a project does while it is being funded is also offset against the long term distortion that the project introduces into the community. This distortion is in many aspects of the economic arena. One important area is the salary distortion that externally funded projects introduce into the local economy that are totally unsustainable without external funding. Another area is in funding expectations for local entrepreneurs who may get subsidy while the project is operating, but not when it ends … and their business crashes. All sorts of other distortions come into the local economy when a project launches … and another set when the project ends!

    The metrics used by the World Bank, most academics,  and all the other participants in the development space totally fail to address this problem in part because most if not all of the metrics are about the project, the organization and the intended clients with little consideration and analysis of the economic issues beyond this envelope … either in terms of organization, space or time.
    The framework of Community Analytics addresses this in a very simple but powerful way … rather than doing analysis from within the organization as is most usually practiced, the perspective of the analysis is community centric.
    Thus for example it is possible with the prevailing metrics for a BRAC or Grameen or any other MFI to report on their performance and it is difficult to validate or discount the claims … and it is easy for the detractors of the BRAC or Grameen performance to find examples of places where the performance seems to have been less than claimed. Both are probably right … but the argument is a waste of time.
    What we need to know is whether the communities … all of them … each of them … are/is progressing or not, and to what extent the various interventions, including or not, the intervention of MFIs seems to be helping or not … and if not, whether it is the MFI’s performance that is at fault or other factors in the community.
    Wherever I have worked with a community focus, it has been very clear what big issues were getting in the way of progress … or facilitating progress. The further one moves away from community analysis the less clarity there is … and the more the argument and the role of prejudice and opinion.
    Peter Burgess
Tr-Ac-Net Inc. Community Analytics (CA)

Posted in reply to: USAID Launches Value Chain Development Wiki in group SEEP Community Discussion.

Read more http://communities.seepnetwork.org/node/2026#comment-1463
Ap09: monthly congressional oversight report - what the treasury is doing "assumes that the losses are not real"

Demos Conference April 09- Organisations that are too big to fail are too big to exist 

without trillion dollar audit, americans are consigning their kids to less and less wealth and health

banksters! our financial system became a ponzi scheme
Inconvenient Truth: Humanity has never been capable of sustaining giant organisational systems and giant organisational systems cannot sustain humanity. Read how The Economist foresaw back in 1976 that gigantic organisations have no place in entrepreneurial futures.
Be the system corporate, government, capitalist, communist, profesional or academic, giant system failure happens like this  -
  • eventually an error or conflict with true purpose enters into the giant system unchecked- it then spreads and compounds over time like a cancer  -destroying how goodwill needs to flow relentlessly when spinning true purpose between productive and demanding relationships of all the people in the system;
  • next the top of the system gets separated from serving the system's outside such as customers or environment; from then on each quarter the system gets ever more ruled by the vested interests of the top people- often accidentally, often as they pay professionals to advise them who knowingly or unkowingly echo what the top wants to hear. What Gandhi called loss of Satyagraha just as Winston Churchill was warning the West about Inconvenient Truth

In the modern era, I first encountered giant system's vicious conditioming in a Big 5 accounting firm in 1989. I had been summoned to a senior partner's office- there on the wall behind his desk was a huge plaque - I recommend firm XXX because they always do precisely what I tell them to do. Robert Maxwell.

Maxwell was one of the early billion dollar collapses that the globalizing professions failed to spot ahead of time. A few years later I encountered the same tragedy in one of the world's largest advertising agencies- there was a plaque recommending the agency as always communicating what we want signed by one of the Big 5 accounting firms!

By 2000 Unseen Wealth expert research, whose reports were issued out of Brookings and Georgetown in Washington DC and later confirmed by intangibles research at the European Union in Brussels: stated that unless we introduced a missing mathematical audit to counter quarterly monetization's smash and grab, compound implosions of trillion dollar entities would spiral- of which the impacts of Enron, Andersen and the media censorship of both sides of the Atlantic in the carbonised race to the Iraq war were early examples.

By late 2007 the confusion between DC and New York and globally mediated macroeconomists had set the stage of multi-trillion dollar meltdowns linking subprime, ratings agencies, wall street's biggest banks and financial services and many of their bretheren in NW hemispheres. Nor was this all. At least a decade of hiring america's brightest MBAs to work creative numbers replaced truly needed investments like that of the next generation's green energy or healthcare. We will log deeper reporting of these folie majeurs in 3 columns- on the left is the Scottish microeconomic view of why giant systems always fail eventually; it is based on nearly a third of a millennium of entrepreneurial questioning how Scotals lost nation's independence to an international banking scam of 1700; in the middle column is the only nation to have spent its entire life beaming up true microeconomics solutions - a third of a century - building its economy up from the bottom and collaboratively across open networks : its future capitalism offers of partnership offer solutions for the worldwide to connect with; in the right hand column we look at future history since 1984 and help youth ask of future capitalism: will this turn of the first decade in century 21 map how to prevent the world wars and great depression that the 20th century rolled out - Yes We Can collaborate transparently map, unite interactions around sustainability and our generations race to end poverty - but will we?

coming soon - the 3 way contributions of Scotland, Bangladesh and winwinwin Youthful curiosity

tda.jpg

Transparency's Most Vital Survey

Ask those who are over 50 and who make decisions or professionally advise on globalization system consequences, what have they practiced over last third of a century.The people I trust most to ending trillion dollar meltdowns

  • Muhammad Yunus who since 1976 has spent 33 years designing and practicing microcredit banking systems originally to help sustain the poorest people and communities in Bangladesh, these systems now reach over 100 million or the poorest families around the world- they have never needed a bailout. Dr Yunus invites youth ambassadors and leaders who facilitate what local to global future the www generation can sustain to his 69th birthday parts- Dhaka, 29 June 2009.
  • My father Norman Macrae whose 1976 survey in The Economist developed the concepts of Entrepreneurial Revolution around integrating small innovation experiments until a community could understand the win-win-win purpose of any new invention and then replicate it through free markets wherever societies could be sustained from the entrepreneur’s good news

As a mathematician my own bio since 1976 is detailed and contributes some very minor pieces to such big picture heroes of where is humanity going

1976 started compiling multi-million hours of interviews on what societies around the world wanted most; 1984 input scenarios of internet age into my father's 2024 report - would the generation that went local to global design a hyper-connecting system to sustain or end our species' future?; 1989 my book world class brands questioned whether transparency of global media would be designed around hi-trust or low-trust; my 1995 book provided an audit of questions everyone connecting/compounding goodwill around a leadership purpose needs to have updated answers to beyond just seeing quarterly numbers; 1998 first started mapping value multiplying audits in response to a question on the future of the global accounting profession - on seeing interviews of 100 leaders of one of Big 5 - forecast their implosion unless urgent and purposeful conflict resolution between entrepreneurial inputs and value demands became their leadership team's job number 1; 2009 still struggling to explain to all 20th century's biggest professions that their additive rules are the most dangerous theories we could possibly be ruled by in net working’s connected (ie multiplicative) age. If you can help me or I can help you assess risks of a trillion dollar global system's futures exponential up or down , I am chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk Washington DC bureau 301 881 1655


13 trillion - its not enough and its already too much

AIG's little social network
 

 credit swaps on could usa default - up 15 fold in 15 months

.

Archive Older

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

http://futurecapitalism.ning.com/forum/topics/does-anyone-think-usa-banks

black- america's big banks became a ponzi scheme http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/transcript1.html


co-author of monthly report on congressional oversight on tarp - in yesterday's monthly report we conclude treasury policy only make sense if you believe the losses are unreal


kuttner - this is becoming the worst thing ever to have happened to a generation of americans


robert johnson , former managing director of soros funds- I have know geihtner's family for 15 years but I am sorry to say I think its time he was asked to resign http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/bill-moyers-journal-robert-johnson


====

help me if you have a simple way of explaining more of this since i get the feeling that 99% of america doesnt really understand the full stories of what will happen next


chris

7:31 pm edt 

image
anything surprise you on the weiss list ? personally I would upward rate whole foods, any others?
I must alert you, though, that many of today’s safest banks are smaller, regional banks. So for the safest bank in YOUR area, be sure to follow my instructions on the Web resource pages that come with your copy of The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide.
Second, whatever bank you choose, make sure your deposits remain comfortably under the old FDIC insurance coverage limits of $100,000. The new $250,000 per account limit is temporary; not something I believe you can rely on long term.
Third, even the safest bank in America won’t be able to guarantee immediate access to your money if the U.S. government declares a 1933-style banking holiday.
But if you’ve been worrying about how to make sure you have access to your cash even in a massive banking meltdown, I have good news for you: The simple truth is, you don’t need to have a savings or checking account at any bank, S&L or credit union!
In the 1930s banking crisis — and even in the confusion of the Civil War — the U.S. Treasury has never defaulted on its debt. And even if you’re among the minority of folks who would not trust the government with their money for the next 30 years, you can certainly trust them for 13 weeks!
To buy a 13-week Treasury bill directly from the U.S. Treasury Department, just go to the TreasuryDirect website, and follow the simple instructions they provide. You will have no intermediary standing between you and your investment. Plus, if you check the appropriate box, your Treasury bills will be automatically rolled over as they mature.
Fourth, money market funds that invest almost exclusively in short-term U.S. Treasury securities are even more convenient and can give you most of the same deposit and checking services as a bank. Because your money is invested in Treasuries that are backed up by the Rolls Royce of government guarantees, you never have to worry that your bank could go belly up.
Plus, while the FDIC guarantees ONLY $250,000 of the funds you have deposited in banks, there is no limit to the Treasury Department’s guarantee on all its Treasury securities, whether you buy them directly or through money market fund.
The interest you earn is exempt from local and state taxes. The management fees are less than the account fees banks charge. When you buy through a money fund, you can write checks on your balances, just as you do with any bank checking account — and checking is truly free. Nor do you need separate accounts for checking, saving and time deposits.
Problem: Some of these money market funds have close their doors to new investors. But in my book and with the Web resources that come with my book, I give you the names of funds that continue to accept new money.
Plus, for my full list of 12 crucial steps for keeping ALL of your money safe even in a worst case scenario, just grab a copy of The Ultimate Depression Survival Guide and flip over to Chapter Six.

Step #4:
Save your investments before it’s too late!

If you own stocks, the best advice anybody could possibly give you right now is, simply, “SELL!”
image
Remember: From its peak in 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 90%. That would be tantamount to a plunge of more than 12,600 points from the Dow’s 2007 peak this time around — to a low of approximately 1500, or an additional 80% decline from today’s levels.
But even in proportion to the size of the U.S. economy, the debt bubble that preceded this depression is two times larger than the one that caused the great Wall Street bloodletting in the 1930s. So it’s not a stretch to say that this bear market could be equally severe. And even if it’s only half as bad, you’d still be looking at a further stock market decline of about 40%.
So unless you can bear additional losses of 50% … 70% … up to 80%
5:53 pm edt 


Archive Older

Enter main content here

transparency.tv - best transparency webs on the net
governance valuetrue.com
thriving carbon negative economies gshakti.org microenergycredits.com ashdenawards.org

Enter supporting content here

Powered by Register.com